Some motor neurons succumb to the pathology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis early in the disease, while others manage to survive much longer. In the October 2 Neuron, researchers suggest that the most vulnerable neurons are those that are least electrically excitable, while the more resistant ones are more easily excited. Boosting excitability protected motor neurons, the research shows. The findings appear counterintuitive, because an established hypothesis holds that in ALS, aka Lou Gehrig’s disease, neural excitation produces excess glutamate that in turn damages motor neurons. The scientists speculated that when and how strongly excitation occurs might determine whether it benefits or harms the cell. It is possible that early in the disease excitation protects neurons, while later on too much of it is toxic, they suggested.
Senior author Pico Caroni and colleagues at the Friedrich Miescher Institute in Basel, Switzerland, study motor neurons’ vulnerability to mutant superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), a major cause of familial ALS (see ARF related news story on Saxena et al., 2009). Neurons fall victim to this disease in three waves. First to falter are the large, rapid-firing, and fast-fatigable motor neurons that mediate quick actions, such as jumping. Next to go are the rapid-firing but fast-fatigue-resistant motor neurons, which also generate quick movements but tire more slowly. Finally, the slow motor neurons that control extended activities, such as standing, begin to degenerate (Pun et al., 2006). Researchers know little about the first group other than that they are less excitable than other types, Caroni told Alzforum. In the current work, joint first authors Smita Saxena and Francesco Roselli investigated whether excitability influences vulnerability. Saxena has since moved to the University of Bern, Switzerland.
The Benefits of Excitation
First, the researchers needed a method to assess motor neuron pathology early on in disease. They used antibodies against misfolded SOD1 (Gros-Louis et al., 2010) to time its appearance in fast-fatigable and fast-fatigue-resistant motor neurons in mice overexpressing mutant human SOD1. They saw that misfolded SOD1 appeared in the first week of life, well before symptoms, in the fast-fatigable cells, but only arose just before symptom onset in the fatigue-resistant neurons. This pattern emerged in a rapid-disease model that accumulates SOD1 beginning at 2 months of age, and in a more slowly progressing model that shows signs of pathology at 5 months.
Next, Saxena and colleagues asked whether altering the excitability of particular neuron types would change the buildup of misfolded SOD1. They expressed either of two chimeric ion channels in the motor neurons as tools to render the cells more excitable or less. These chimeric channels had been previously engineered such that they could be activated with small molecules (Magnus et al., 2011). Both versions include cation channels coupled to a portion of the acetylcholine receptor, and turn on when that receptor portion binds a benzamide ligand. One version includes part of a serotonin receptor and, once its ligand has bound, depolarizes neurons, enhancing their excitability. The other includes a portion of a glycine receptor, and ligand binding causes hyperpolarization and reduced excitability of the neuron.
To express these channels specifically in motor neurons, Saxena and colleagues used a Cre-Lox system with Cre activated by the choline acetyltransferase promoter, which is active in motor neurons. They targeted the floxed ion channel genes to one side of the lumbar spinal cord with a viral vector, leaving the other side to act as an internal control. They then injected receptor ligands daily, to activate these engineered channels and manipulate neuronal excitability at will.
Boosting motor neuron excitability with the serotonin chimera reduced SOD1 misfolding. Dampening excitability increased misfolding. In fact, the SOD1 aggregates in the hyperexcitable neurons seemed to disappear, Caroni noted, suggesting that it is possible to dissolve them (see image below). The treatment also delayed denervation of the muscles innervated by the fast-fatigable motor neurons.
Motor neurons (red) expressing an activating channel (green) exhibited fewer SOD1 aggregates (lower panel) than motor neurons without the channel on the contralateral side of the spinal cord (left side of both panels) Image courtesy Pico Caroni and Neuron, October 2, 2013
The researchers theorized that the intensified excitability might be a defense mechanism. Going back to the regular mutant SOD1 model, they noticed that motor neurons had fewer inhibitory synapses and more excitatory synapses than did the same neurons in control, wild-type animals. Caroni believes this to be a natural neuroprotective response to the accumulated SOD1. In particular, cholinergic C-boutons, a type of synapse that promotes excitation, were larger in SOD1 animals than in controls.
Does a neuron’s excitability influence how long it survives? To answer that, Saxena and her colleagues focused on the C-boutons, reasoning that if they promote excitability and neuroprotection, then blocking input to them should speed up pathology. Sure enough, treating the mice with methoctramine, a commercial muscarinic receptor agonist that specifically blocks acetylcholine signaling to C-boutons, drove up levels of misfolded SOD1 in motor neurons.
Next, the scientists examined how C-bouton signaling might protect neurons by comparing expression and activation of several candidate molecules in vulnerable and resistant neurons in mSOD1 mice. They noticed that the receptor mammalian target of rapamycin, aka mTOR, was highly activated in the vulnerable motor neurons. Treating the mice with the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin increased SOD1 misfolding further, suggesting that mTOR activity protects the neurons. The researchers do not know how the C-boutons activate mTOR, or how mTOR might reduce SOD1 misfolding.
In a pilot study, five SOD1 mice treated with rapamycin died about a month sooner than did five controls, supporting the idea that mTOR signaling is protective. The detrimental effects of rapamycin here stand in direct contrast to the protective effects seen with this drug in other neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s and Huntington’s, noted Mark Mattson of the National Institute on Aging in Baltimore, Maryland, in a preview accompanying the Neuron study (see Zhang et al., 2011; Sarkar et al., 2009). Rapamycin is an immunosuppressant drug used in organ transplantation.
The mTOR protein participates in numerous pathways where it could contribute to disease. The finding in the current study should remind scientists that they cannot always generalize between conditions, said Christopher Henderson of Columbia University in New York, who was not involved in the study. Other commentators noted that they would like to see the experiment repeated with larger numbers of animals. Typically, ALS researchers prefer to use at least 20 SOD1 animals per treatment group because their survival and behavioral phenotypes are variable, said Brett Morrison of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, who was not involved with the work (see Shineman et al., 2011). While a small handful of animals would be sufficient for the majority of biochemical and staining experiments in the paper, the survival results are more provocative than conclusive, Morrison said.
Too Much of a Good Thing?
Overall, Caroni’s results point to excitability as a neuroprotective response to the mutant SOD1 gene. This conclusion surprised Mattson, who noted in his preview that several other studies suggest that motor neurons die, in part, due to the toxicity of excess glutamate produced by over-firing (reviewed in Rothstein, 2009; and see Alzforum news story on Cucchiaroni et al., 2010). Notably, riluzole, the only drug clinically approved for ALS, is thought to work by diminishing motor neuron excitation. “Most people thought that hyper-excitability is bad, and leads to degeneration later on,” said Henderson.
In an effort to reconcile Caroni’s results with previous work, Mattson suggested the phenomenon of hormesis, in which low levels of a stimulus are beneficial, while higher exposure becomes detrimental. In addition, timing could play a role, suggested Morrison. That is, low-level excitability in presymptomatic stages could stave off disease for a while, but excess excitation in the final stages—when riluzole might work best—could hasten it. Whether the same phenomenon would hold true in cases of ALS due to mutations in genes other than SOD1, or sporadic cases, remains to be determined, Mattson wrote.
How about protective excitability in people? Exercise, which forces motor neurons to fire more often, protects some kinds of neurons, Mattson noted (reviewed in Stranahan and Mattson, 2012). However, some studies (for example, Scarmeas et al., 2002) suggest that elite athletes are at higher-than-average risk for ALS. One cannot necessarily equate exercise with neural excitability, Henderson pointed out. Little is known about excitability in the motor neurons of people with ALS, and experts who spoke with Alzforum could not immediately suggest ways to study it.
With regard to therapies modulating neural excitability, clinicians recently halted the Phase 3 trial of ceftriaxone, a drug that dampens excitotoxicity, because it showed no improvement over placebo (see Alzforum news story).
Saxena S, Roselli F, Singh K, Leptien K, Julien JP, Gros-Louis F, Caroni P. Neuroprotection through Excitability and mTOR Required in ALS Motoneurons to Delay Disease and Extend Survival. Neuron. 2013 Oct 2;80(1):80-96. Abstract
Mattson MP. Excitation BolsTORs Motor Neurons in ALS Mice. Neuron. 2013 Oct 2;80(1):1-3. Abstract
To view commentaries, primary articles and linked stories, go to the original posting on Alzforum.org here.
Copyright © 1996–2017 Biomedical Research Forum, LLC. All Rights Reserved.Share this: